CLICK TO BUY THIS PRODUCT WITH DISCOUNTS AND BONUSES

CLICK TO BUY THIS PRODUCT WITH DISCOUNTS AND BONUSES
Product: WP Click Viral WhiteLabel Rights DS

Saturday 29 October 2016

A man who allegedly detained Housemaid for sexual exploit has been arraigned in court

 Man Has been arraigned in court against sexual exploit with housemaid



   The police on Friday arraigned a middle-aged man, Dominic Abutu, in a Wuse Zone 2 Chief Magistrates’ Court in Abuja for unlawfully detaining a 20-year-old girl for sexual purpose.

Abutu of Karimo, Abuja, was arraigned on a two-count charge of unlawful detention and rape, which he pleaded not guilty.

The Prosecutor, John Simon, said that the matter was reported by Jennifer Buba at the Wuse Police Station on Oct. 20.

Simon said that the complainant received a call from her niece stating that she was held hostage by the defendant at his house.

He said that the victim was staying at Mpape with her Aunt before the defendant got her a job as a housemaid in Maitama.

The prosecutor said that after some days the victim called the defendant and complained that she didn’t like the place she was working.
Simon said that the defendant asked her to come to his house so that he could take her to another house to work.

He said that since then the defendant unlawfully detained the victim against her will to have unlawful sexual intercourse with her.
The prosecutor said the offences contravened sections 273 and 275 of Penal Code.

The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The Senior Magistrate, Fatima Bukar, granted bail to the defendant in the sum of N200, 000 with a surety in like sum.
Bukar said that the surety must reside within the jurisdiction of the court, and adjourned the matter till Nov. 14 for hearing.


Place your comments on the comments box  and like our facebook page, Click here if you are not redirected

(ONDO NEWS) if care is not taking Ondo will be set on fire if INEC retains Jimoh ibrahim as PDP Candidate --Mimiko

Ondo will burn if Jimoh Ibrahim remains the PDP  candidate -- Mimiko

       Ondo State Governor Olusegun Mimiko has told President Muhammadu Buhari that the substitution of the Peoples Democratic Party’s governorship candidate in the state, Eyitayo Jegede, with Jimoh Ibrahim can lead to a breakdown of law and order in the state.
The governor disclosed this to State House correspondents on Friday in Abuja after he met with the president behind closed doors.
The Independent National Electoral Commission had on Thursday replaced Jegede with Ibrahim as PDP’s candidate for the November 26 gubernatorial election in the state.

When his reaction was sought, Mimiko expressed shock at the sudden change in INEC’s position even as he described it as injustice.

He said the president promised to look into the matter and rectify the injustice if any.
He said: “I’m shocked. In logic, in law and in politics, there is no basis for it whatsoever. 
   The Jimoh Ibrahim factor in all of this is predicated on a court order given by Justice Abang. Incidentally, that court order is about zonal and state executives of PDP. That order is about 2019 election. Neither Ibrahim nor Jegede was party to the suit.

“When Ibrahim’s name was sent to INEC after a primary election was conducted in Ibadan without INEC monitoring it, without security agencies; when the name got to INEC and this Abang judgement was attached, INEC took the right decision initially by making it clear that it is not state or zonal executive that is empowered by the Electoral Act to conduct the election.
“Two, the Abang judgement on the basis of which they were putting pressure on INEC to accept Jimoh Ibrahim as a candidate was referring to 2019 election.

“Ab initio, INEC had refused and discountenanced Ibrahim’s name as a candidate. Then they went ahead and filed form 48 and from the blues, the same Justice Abang mandated INEC to replace Jegede who emerged through a primary process supervised by INEC and security agencies on live television with all delegates that were supposed to participate.

“Then, Abang ordered that Ibrahim should replace Jegede. Ordinarily, we should have disregarded the order, but we were advised that it was very important for us to appeal so that if anybody is up to a mischief, we would have taken the plank off the person.

We don’t want to take chances because somebody in INEC told us that they obey the last order in the commission. Some went to court and obtained two different orders mandating INEC not to substitute Jegede.

“We served one on INEC around 10 am yesterday and we served INEC with the other one at the close of business around 3 pm. Only around 7 or 8 pm, we got to know that INEC, for no justifiable reason, had substituted Jegede’s name and replaced it with that of Ibrahim.


“The question to ask is: on whose order has INEC done that? Apart from the fact that we have two restraining orders on INEC, INEC knows full well that Ibrahim’s primary was in Ibadan. There was no report by any security agencies that the security situation in Ondo State warranted the Movement of the primaries to Ibadan or anywhere outside the state for that matter. Under INEC guidelines, the time for substitution of candidates has even elapsed.

Friday 28 October 2016

(ONDO NEWS) jimoh Ibrahim blast Governor Olusegun Mimiko over protest today


Mimiko got blasted on the governorship election protest by Jimoh Ibrahim
 
    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) recognized People’s Democratic Party’s governorship candidate in next month’s election in Ondo State, Mr. Jimoh Ibrahim, faulted Friday’s protest in the state as the handiwork to Governor Olusegun Mimiko.

Youths and okada riders in Akure, the state capital and Ondo had Friday shut down the two towns for several hours to show their displeasure at the decision of the INEC to substitute the name of Mr.Eyitayo Jegede with that of Jimoh as the party’s candidate.
Jegede belongs to the Ahmed Makarfi faction of the party while Ibrahim is of the Alo Modu Sheriff faction.

Ibrahim in a statement entitled ‘Tyre Burning for Sympathy’ and personally signed by him said the protest had Mimiko’s signature all over it.

He alleged that the governor way back in 2009 ‘deceived’ the election petition tribunal in the state that “there were security issues in the state, leading to the cancellation of results in eight out of 18 local governments of the state.”

He added: “Mimiko called on the drivers’ union in the state, whose chairman is his relative, to gather disposed tyres across the state and burn them so as to show that there are security challenges in Akure town.

“While the tyres were burning, school children were attending their classes. Banks were opened, market women and traders were carrying on their economic activities, courts were sitting and more tyres were burning by the side of the road.

“Regrettably, Mimiko’s orthodoxy has played out to be fake, empty and unbecoming of a person that occupies the position of the governor of a state .

“This tyre burning for sympathy will not work as Ondo State remains peaceful.”

beyond The federal Republic of Nigeria President (Buhari) and the Formal president (Jonathan )

  Columnist by OKEY IKECHUKWU



As actors in a crisis-ridden political environment,

Presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Muhammadu
Buhari are not solely responsible for our present
national problems. .
The PDP, the APC, or the
two together, also do not bear exclusive blame
for everything wrong with Nigeria today. They
have their real and imagined shortcomings, of
course, but they are also victims of generations
of leaders and followers brought up on impunity,
consumption and arbitrary use of state power.

The many powerful people whose interests
differ from the national interest are partly
responsible for the trajectory of the two
presidents and of most past regimes and
presidents. So let us first calmly admit that our
crises have had long gestation. To fail to do so
is to ignore history, particularly the essential
elements of our own history, and replace it with
hysteria. As my friend, Bishop Kukah, said
during a recent joint television discussion
programme, and during which I agreed
completely with him: “The Nigerian nation has
been run as a criminal enterprise for too long”.
We have been building a mansion on quicksand
and with pillars of straw. The soil, quicksand as
it is, is further infested with two species of
ants, called presumption and nepotism. These
ants, which feed exclusively on straw, have
been nibbling away for decades. They have left
us with a hollow and painted frame that
conceals a lie. This lie has been on parade for
decades. It is described as an architectural
masterpiece by casual observers. An
architectural masterpiece that is not designed
to withstand the wind? Now that the whirlwind
has come, and the elements are in their
element, radical modifications (in design and
material) have become necessary.
It is not right that a nation should be
undergirded by untruth. It is also not right that a
nation should be under a political economy of
decay and corruption, warehoused and
propagated by a business and political elite that
lives in denial. When old lies are told afresh by
those who know they are lying, a time comes
when even the liars themselves won’t be sure
whether they are lying anymore. Reason? Others
would be repeating the same lies with great
aplomb everywhere.
Now that we have brought up children who have
seen shielded criminality as leadership, we have
a nation wherein hiding under the instruments of
state to violate natural justice, equity and good
conscience makes you not guilty of any crime.
Look at Nigeria today, 56 years after
independence! The dominant motifs are (1)
skewed values, (2) a flawed national psyche and
(3) an aberrant leadership recruitment process.
These motifs have given us several national
‘leadership pseudopodia’, or “false feet”.
Just as happens with Amoeba, the jelly-like
microorganism that pops out part of its
shapeless body in any direction it wants to
move, Nigeria’s leadership pseudopodia (or new
regimes with insular notions about nation
building) usually spring new agenda, new
national ideals and new aspirations on everyone
without warning and without consultation. They
have since replaced National Development Plans
with limited regime goals, and often without
plans or strategy. And it all vanishes without
trace with the demise of each regime.
A major misdirection of the State and people
occurred on January 15, 1966, when Major
Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu announced his
military coup d’etat. That coup saw a junior
officer issuing instructions to his superiors. It
saw murder as an instrument for leadership
recruitment and transformation. It saw an
officer peremptorily informing the nation (by
mere announcement about ‘Extraordinary
Orders’) that all local administration in the
country was now under the ‘local military
commander’, who would mete out any
punishment he ‘deemed appropriate’ to anyone
who disobeyed him.
It left right and wrong in the hands of
individuals of, sometimes, questionable
antecedents. It violated Service Discipline and
set new paradigms for the collapse of esprit de
corps in the armed forces. It also created a
dilemma in diplomatic circles, for which even
Ambassador Jolaosho’s experience as a
diplomat did not prepare him when the Germans
asked: “Why did your people kill your prime
Minister, instead of voting him out of office”?
That coup sidetracked the existing crop of
leaders and their ‘replacement generation’. A
generation groomed along ideological lines in
leadership recruitment stagnated for 12 years,
until 1979. The trio of Zik, Awo and Aminu Kano,
who would since given way to the likes of
Tafawa Balewa, Michael Okpara, Bola Ige and
others before 1979, turned up as presidential
candidates, because of the 1966 coup. This
created the backlog of two generations of
leaders that we are still unable to deal with
today. The average age of party youth leaders,
the National Association of Nigerian Students
(NANS) and the Nigerian Youth Movement
(NYM) says it all.
The Nzeogwu coup was ushered in by a series
of murders. It laid the foundations for
subsequent murders and abominations. It set
the tone for the eventual replacement of
professional military service and responsible
national leadership with personal and
ethnocentric desires, misuse of office and titles,
political illiteracy and petulant idealism and
exuberance. Everything forbidden by our
traditional values the popular religions
eventually became normal.
Many “Excellencies” emerged from this murk,
filling our post-1966 nationhood with sporadic
and spasmodic declarations of new national
goals, new federating units and much more.
These were the off springs of the high yielding
‘seeds of death’ sown with fertilizer on January
15, 1966. The discerning could see no deep
personal maturity, no national grand vision, little
real wisdom and no enlightened patriotism on
the part of many of the principal actors.
Do we know, for instance, that the Armed
Forces Remembrance Day we celebrate every
15th January affronts us all? That date
bespeaks impropriety and is inappropriate
accolades. Nzeogwu’s action, disguised for
decades under the mistaken notion that
“patriotism” excuses immaturity and unmitigated
arbitrary exercise of discretion, birthed many
institutional and axiological horrors that we are
living with today. It was on January 15 that
some highly respected senior citizens, and some
of our best senior military officers, were
murdered in cold blood.
One major further aftermath, over decades, is
the epidemic of prematurely retired military,
many of who have passed on, or are living
today, as frustrated and unfulfilled
professionals. Others were last seen, or heard,
as failed politicians, owners of failed banks and
failed airlines, failed philanthropists, failed
traditional rulers and much more. Yet they
initially joined the armed forces to become
military professionals, unlike some of their later
colleagues who joined during the triumph of
military regimes as a short cut to wealth.
So let us ask ourselves whether we should be
celebrating Armed Forces Remembrance Day on
the day families of some of Nigeria’s greatest
leaders are in mourning. We have several
military exploits, including the final triumph of
ECOMOG, or the day Buhari rallied the Nigerian
military to route Chadian incursion during the
Shagari Presidency, to make our Armed Forces
Remembrance Day. That will save us from
holding up a day that blights our collective
dignity as decent people to salute the gallantry
of our armed forces.
No nation develops by having its high quality
human capital and professionals, military or not,
routinely swept out of service. Not after so
much had been invested in training them! Now
that events have come full circle on all fronts
and we are seeing the impossibility of
sustaining untruth with layers of mud, there is
no good news out there. Look again: there is
only, perhaps, the dawning realization that the
nation is a grand scam perpetrated and
facilitated by public and civil servants and their
private sector allies. Look again! A dismantling
of Nigeria’s ‘false legs’, or pseudopodia, is
afoot.
We should not continue to project a day that
reminds us that a civil war ended in Nigeria with
the complete economic disenfranchisement of a
section of the country. The South East was not
really rehabilitated, reconstructed and reconciled
to the rest of the country after the civil war. It
is perhaps still not reintegrated, even today.
Chief Adeniran Ogunsanya and others protected
properties of Igbos in Lagos while the civil war
lasted and returned same to the owners after
the war. But the same Igbos lost their
belongings in another part of the country as
“abandoned property”. It was all taken over by
their fellow countrymen to whom they were
allegedly reconciled after the war. The nation’s
ill-fated leadership trajectory has been a
consistent violation of the cardinal principle of
sustainable leadership and national
development.
The nascent 16 years old democracy, has
thrown up leaders with sudden stupendous
wealth. That wealth has impacted only their
immediate and extended families, of less than
15 persons, and a few friends. Their local
communities, members of their religious
congregations, most of their friends and even
members of their extended families know how
poor or rich they were a few years earlier. Some
envy them even. The priests, traditional rulers
and other supposed custodians of public
conscience ask no questions.
They honour them, instead. Meanwhile, almost
everyone, including their kith and kin silently
regard them as thieves who got away with their
loot!
As the nation reels, let the friends and admirers
of Presidents Jonathan and Buhari pull
themselves together and stop thinking that any
criticism of the government, or person, of
President Muhammadu Buhari is an automatic
endorsement of the tenure and performance of
their man. It cannot be. The Jonathan
Presidency could have done much better than it
did, but allowed itself to be ruined by avoidable
blunders, indecisiveness, image deficits, and a
consistent failure to present an inspiring
comportment.
Friends and admirers of President Buhari, too,
should note that it can do much better than it is
doing at the moment. Insularity, with the risk of
crippling itself is the real danger. Let us realize
that there is mourning in the land and across all
divides. Nigeria’s flawed and overlooked
fundamentals have come back to haunt the
nation. . 
 It all boils down to the absence of truth,
deep knowledge, nobility of soul, propriety in
public office, dignity in self-presentation,
graceful ambience, competence and decency in leadership; for which neither Buhari nor Jonathan are solely responsible. Let 's continue praying!

The scandal rocking the exit of the winner of Miss Anambra Beauty Pageant, Miss Chidinma Okeke, has read all here-->

Miss Anambra  pageant organizers disowned the beauty queen on sex scandal.
 by Ademolu Adeola





The scandal rocking the exit of the winner of Miss Anambra Beauty Pageant, Miss Chidinma Okeke, has assumed a different dimension with the organisers of the pageant washing their hands off the actions of the queen.

The video which was released in two batches, has the 2015 winner of the pageant in a video that has gone viral on the cyber space, with the queen involving in lesbian act with another lady who has so far not been identified.

A statement signed by the Chairman, Chief Executive of Anambra Broadcasting Service (ABS), organizers of the pageant, Nze Uche Nworah, disowned the queen for her action in the video, saying that the pageant was set up to maintain high moral standard and to empower young ladies from the state.

Part of the statement read: “The attention of the management of the Anambra Broadcasting Service, organisers of the Miss Anambra Beauty Pageant has been drawn to a video with lurid contents purportedly showing former Miss Anambra, Miss Chidinma Okeke (Miss Anambra 2015).
“We wish to make the following clarifications; The said Miss Chidinma Okeke who is allegedly linked to the lurid content in circulation has served-out her term as Miss Anambra 2015 and handed over the crown in line with the terms and conditions of The Miss Anambra pageant.

“We condemn in clear terms any amoral behaviour/conduct as suggested by the alleged lurid content in circulation and do not condone such. It is on record that The Miss Anambra Beauty Pageant has been a platform to empower Anambra women and celebrate our rich culture and heritage.”

The organisers said the winners of the pageant are bound by contracts to be of good conduct and moral behaviour and to uphold and maintain the honour in their position as queen. It also said winners of the pageant also have a contract to refrain from any personal relationship that could appear to hinder their ability to perform the duties of their office as queen and role model and we do not expect any less.

The pageant also apologised to people of Anambra state, our sponsors, supporters, friends and all those associated with the Miss Anambra project for the embarrassment the mere reference to the pageant in the controversy may have caused; whilereassuring of the good intentions of the Miss Anambra pageant franchise.

Attempt by the queen to brief journalists and present clarifications to the videos, which are still being circulated on Wednesday failed over alleged threats to her life by those she referred to as her blackmailers.

Danfulani pleaded not guilty when the charges were read to him in court.

     Kaduna court remand ex-versity lecturer Over facebook post

    A civil rights activist and former university lecturer, Dr. John Danfulani, was yesterday arraigned before a Kaduna High Court for allegedly inciting comments on Facebook against Governor Nasir el-Rufai.

Besides, Danfulani had been arraigned for the same offence by the state government at the Magistrate’s Court on January 6, 2016 before the Chief Magistrate of Court 1, Ibrahim Taiwo Road, Kaduna, presided over by Mallam Awwalu Musa. The state government lost the case in August and did not appeal.
The accused, a former lecturer in the Department of Political Science with Kaduna State University (KASU), had to resign his job with KASU in August 2016 after he was suspended for allegedly “embarrassing” the governor.

In the “notice to prefer a charge” brought before the court and signed by the prosecutors, Bayero Dari and Abdullahi Isiaka of the Ministry of Justice, the state said that the criminal charges against Danfulani fell under Section 417 and 418 of the Penal Code Law.

Danfulani pleaded not guilty when the charges were read to him in court.
But when the issue of bail was raised by his lawyer, Mr. James Kanyip, the judge, Justice Bilikisu Mohammed, said the accused should be remanded in prison till November 7, 2016.

She said she was busy to entertain the application, just as she also informed that she had a seminar to attend and would only be back on that date.

Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) National Commissioner in charge of Voters’ Education.. read all here

 About1.6m people will be eligible to vote on the election day in ONDO STATE on 26th of November  2016 |Mr Solomon shoyebi

 by Ademolu Adeola.


About I, 659, 000 million eligible voters will determine the fate of the 28 candidates for the November 26 governorship election in Ondo State.


Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) National Commissioner in charge of Voters’ Education, Mr Solomon Shoyebi, who disclosed this yesterday, said 80 per cent of the voters are between the ages of 18 and 50.
Speaking in Akure, the Ondo State capital, during the release of voters’ register to the political parties participating in the election, Shoyebi said 28 parties will participate in the election.
He further said that the use of smart card reader in the election is sacrosanct, urging the electorate to adhere strictly to all electoral guidelines.

In his remark, the state Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Mr. Olusegun Agbaje, said there are reports that some persons are planning to clone the permanent voter cards, warning that such act attracts severe punishment.

Agbaje also said the cloned cards would be detected by the card readers that would be deployed by INEC for the election.

His words: “We hear people are cloning cards to cheat during the election, cloned cards will not work. The card readers will detect the cloned cards.”

Agbaje warned voters to protect their cards from those who would want to steal them for dubious purposes.

“Protect your cards, don’t sell them, it is a criminal offence. There will be enough card readers, so that if any malfunctions, it would be immediately replaced,” he assured.
The REC also debunked claims by the All Progressives Congress (APC) and businessman, Jimoh Ibrahim, that top officials of the commission in the state have been compromised.

According to him, “INEC has no candidate for the election, anybody who wins will win fairly.” Agbaje said he had wanted to go to court over the allegation, but the response by INEC headquarters has addressed the issue.

“INEC will not do anything that will reduce the credibility it has built through the years,” he said.
He disclosed that his office had taken delivery of non-sensitive materials, which had been distributed to all the local government areas.

The state Police Commissioner, Mrs. Hilda Harrison-Ibifuro, said the command is prepared to bring perpetrators of crime before, during and after the election to book.
She called on political parties to avoid violence and educate their supporters not to destroy posters of political opponents as such acts would be treated as a serious crime.